Credit Servicing: Outcome of Consultation on Transposition of EU Directive

The Department of Finance has published its decisions following the consultation on the transposition of the EU Directive on Credit Servicers and Credit Purchasers1(the “Directive”) (here).    

Background

Ireland has its own bespoke credit servicing regime, which pre-dates the Directive.  The Directive seeks to foster the development of the EU’s capital markets union by reducing the barriers to trade of “NPLs” by EU credit institutions in particular.  The Directive places obligations on Ireland to transpose the minimum requirements of the Directive and allows discretion on the implementation of a limited number of provisions.  The approach that Ireland ought to take regarding these discretionary matters formed the basis of the ten questions posed in the consultation to stakeholders, which closed on 8 March 2023 (see our briefing here for further information). 

The published outcome of the consultation sets out the initial decisions taken by the Department following consideration of the submissions received. The Directive is due to be transposed into Irish law and in effect by 30 December 2023.

Consultation outcomes

The Department stresses that its decisions (outlined in the table below) remain subject to change where necessary in the context of the finalisation of the transposition of the Directive.

Question and discretion

Decision of the Department of Finance

Question 1: Do you think that Ireland should exclude public notaries, bailiffs and lawyers from the application of the Directive as transposed into Irish law?

(Article 2(6) discretion)

This discretion will not be exercised. Under the domestic regulatory framework for credit servicing firms, these entities are not exempted from the requirement to be authorised if they perform credit servicing activities. A similar position will be taken in the transposition of the Directive.

Question 2: Do you think that credit servicers authorised in Ireland under this Directive should be allowed to receive and hold funds from borrowers, or should be prevented from doing so?

(Article 6(1) discretion)

This discretion will be exercised. The management of payments by borrowers and the holding of funds on behalf of credit purchasers is considered to be an important function of credit servicers. It has been decided to exercise this discretion and to provide for the measures required of credit servicers in Article 6(2) in the transposition of the Directive.

Question 3: Do you think that Ireland should require credit servicers to keep and maintain relevant records for a period of more than five years after the termination of a credit servicing agreement with a credit purchaser?

(Article 11(4) discretion)

This discretion will be exercised. In line with the record retention period as provided for in the Consumer Protection Code, a record retention period of six years will be provided for in the transposition of the Directive.

Question 4: Do you think that Ireland should exercise this discretion and provide that EU based credit purchasers should appoint credit servicers under this EU framework in respect of credit agreements other than non-performing agreements concluded with consumers?

(Article 17(1) discretion)

This discretion will not be exercised.  It has been decided to maintain the existing domestic regulatory regime for credit servicers and credit purchasers (including the obligation on the holder of the legal title to the rights of the creditor to be authorised) for matters and agreements not expressly covered by the scope of the Directive.

Question 5: Do you think Ireland should exercise this discretion to allow natural persons to service credit agreements which fall within the scope of this Directive?

(Article 17(4) discretion)

This discretion will not be exercised.  It has been decided to maintain the default Directive position that a credit servicer must be a legal person.

Question 6: Do you think Ireland should allow a credit servicer to comply, on behalf of the credit purchaser, with the obligations of the credit purchaser including in relation to credit registers?

(Article 17(5) discretion)

This discretion will not be exercised. The Credit Reporting Act 2013 provides for the reporting obligations and duties of all credit information providers in relation to the Central Credit Register and it is considered that these are appropriate and effective and should continue to apply.

Question 7: Do you think Ireland should exercise this discretion and not provide for all of the identified forbearance measures in the transposition of the new Article 16a of the Consumer Credit Directive?

(Article 27 discretion)

This discretion will not be exercised. All the forbearance options listed in the new Article 16a of the Consumer Credit Directive will be included in the statutory instrument transposing this Directive.

Question 8: Do you think that Ireland should allow creditors to (i) define and impose charges on a consumer arising from default, (ii) if so, require that those charges shall be no greater than is necessary to compensate the creditor for costs it has incurred as a result of the default, (iii) allow creditors to impose additional charges on the consumer in the event of default and (iv) if the answer to (iii) is in the positive, what cap should be placed on those charges?

(Article 27 discretion)

This discretion will be exercised in part. In line with a similar provision contained in the  European Union (Consumer Mortgage Credit  Agreements)  Regulations  2016, the new  Article  16a  of the Consumer Credit Directive will be transposed in a manner to provide that (i) a creditor can impose a charge on a consumer arising from a consumer’s default but that any such charge, if imposed by a creditor, shall be no greater than is necessary to compensate the creditor for the cost it has incurred as a result of the default and (ii) a creditor shall not be allowed to impose ‘additional’ charges on a consumer in the event of default.

Question 9: Similar to Question 7, do you think Ireland should exercise this discretion and not provide for all of the identified forbearance measures in the transposition of the amendment to Article 28 of the Mortgage Credit Directive?

(Article 28 discretion)

This discretion will not be exercised. The Department will adopt the same position to the transposition of the amended Article 28 of the Mortgage Credit Directive as that set out in respect of the new Article 16a of the Consumer Credit Directive.

Question 10: Do you think that Ireland’s existing national authorisation and regulatory regime in respect of credit servicing firms (i) is equivalent to, or stricter than, those established in this Directive for credit servicing activities and (ii) if so, should such regulated entities be automatically recognised as authorised credit servicers?

(Article 32(2) discretion)

This discretion will be exercised and entities carrying out credit servicing activities under the provisions of Part V of the Central Bank Act 1997 will be recognized as authorized credit servicers.

 

In summary, the Department plans to exercise four of the discretions and will forego six of them.

Comment and next steps

The publication of the Department’s decisions provides some helpful clarity on how the Directive is likely to be transposed into Irish law.  The content of those decisions, however, seems likely to be considered a mixed result for participants in the NPL market. 

Some of the decisions – such as the automatic recognition of existing Irish credit servicing firm authorisations under the Directive – will no doubt be welcomed.  Others – such as the incoming forbearance and maximum default charge provisions – simply need to be considered and built into policies and procedures (for all consumer lenders; not just those in the NPL market).

However, the decision by the Department to preserve the existing Irish credit servicing regime alongside the new EU regime (once introduced) is likely to be seen as challenging and it will require credit purchasers, sellers and servicing firms to give careful thought to how best to structure transactions and ongoing arrangements to ensure compliance with dual Irish and EU regimes.


  1. Directive (EU) 2021/2167.

This document has been prepared by McCann FitzGerald LLP for general guidance only and should not be regarded as a substitute for professional advice. Such advice should always be taken before acting on any of the matters discussed.